{"id":1220,"date":"2018-10-23T16:48:10","date_gmt":"2018-10-23T14:48:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/?p=1220"},"modified":"2018-10-23T16:48:10","modified_gmt":"2018-10-23T14:48:10","slug":"komunikace-ligy-s-j-c-junckerem-pokracuje","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/2018\/10\/23\/komunikace-ligy-s-j-c-junckerem-pokracuje\/","title":{"rendered":"Komunikace LIGY s J.C.Junckerem pokra\u010duje !"},"content":{"rendered":"

V\u00e1\u017een\u00ed a zde ji\u017e odpov\u011b\u010f LIGY LIBE panu Junckerovi na jeho ned\u00e1vn\u00fd dopis (viz koment zde n\u00ed\u017ee), co n\u00e1m minule poslal
\nI kdy\u017e by nebyl pra\u017e\u00e1dn\u00fd probl\u00e9m zhotoviti na\u0161i odpov\u011b\u010f v slu\u0161n\u00e9 angli\u010dtin\u011b \u010di francouz\u0161tin\u011b, je tento n\u00e1\u0161 dnes odeslan\u00fd „do Bruselu“ naps\u00e1n, neb to regule EU dovoluj\u00ed, p\u0159\u00edmo v na\u0161\u00ed rodn\u00e9 \u0159e\u010di – u\u017e z principi\u00e1ln\u00edch d\u016fvod\u016f, ne?\u00a0\"\"\ud83d\ude42<\/span><\/span>\u00a0)
\nTak\u017ee, pokud by nebylo z\u0159eteln\u00e9 zde ze sken\u016f, citujeme v\u0161e i zde:<\/p>\n

Attn.:
\nJean-Claude Juncker
\nTimo Pesonen
\nEuropean Commission<\/p>\n

Praha, \u010cesk\u00e1 republika, dne 22. 10. 2018<\/p>\n

Re: Odezva na V\u00e1\u0161 dopis zna\u010dky \u201eRef. Ares(2018)5226424 \u2013 11\/10\/2018 \u2013 Letter of protest and complaint to EC\u201c<\/p>\n

V\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane Junckere, V\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane Pesonene,<\/p>\n

d\u011bkujeme za V\u00e1s dopis v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9ho jednac\u00edho \u010d\u00edsla, jedn\u00e1 se o dopis ze dne 11. 10. 2018, je\u017e jsme \u0159\u00e1dn\u011b obdr\u017eeli. Dovolte n\u00e1m nyn\u00ed reagovat v \u010desk\u00e9m jazyce, \u010d\u00edm\u017e nejen vyu\u017e\u00edv\u00e1me pr\u00e1va, je\u017e EU komise velkoryse nab\u00edz\u00ed (tj. p\u0159\u00edjem podn\u011bt\u016f a st\u00ed\u017enost\u00ed ve v\u0161ech unijn\u00edch jazyc\u00edch), ale zejm\u00e9na t\u00edm \u010din\u00edme nemal\u00fd vst\u0159\u00edcn\u00fd krok v\u016f\u010di v\u0161em t\u011bm, jejich\u017e pr\u00e1va, my jako LIGA LIBE, h\u00e1j\u00edme \u2013 tj. cca 303 000 leg\u00e1ln\u00edch dr\u017eitel\u016f zbran\u00ed v \u010cR a cca 200 000 petent\u016f petic proti odzbrojen\u00ed \u2013 kte\u0159\u00ed mnohdy nevl\u00e1dnou jazykem anglick\u00fdm a tomuto dopisu, publikovan\u00e9mu n\u00e1sledn\u011b na ve\u0159ejn\u00fdch zdroj\u00edch, by tak m\u011bli probl\u00e9m porozum\u011bt. Na\u0161imi podporovateli jsou lid\u00e9 nap\u0159\u00ed\u010d zcela v\u0161emi v\u011bkov\u00fdmi spektry, t\u00edm i lid\u00e9 star\u0161\u00edho v\u011bku, proto je jejich neznalost jazyka anglick\u00e9ho pochopiteln\u00e1 \u2013 zejm\u00e9na v zemi, kter\u00e1 \u010delila dv\u011bma diktatur\u00e1m podporuj\u00edc\u00edm jin\u00e9 jazykov\u00e9 znalosti, ne\u017e li pr\u00e1v\u011b jazyka anglick\u00e9ho.<\/p>\n

Nejprve, oce\u0148ujeme \u010das i \u00fasil\u00ed, kter\u00fd jste v\u011bnovali odezv\u011b n\u00e1m \u2013 m\u00edn\u011bno odezv\u011b nejen n\u00e1m, tj. prez\u00eddiu LIGY LIBE, ale tak\u00e9 cca 303 000 leg\u00e1ln\u00edm dr\u017eitel\u016fm zbran\u00ed v \u010cR a cca 200 000 petent\u016fm petic proti odzbrojen\u00ed (odzbrojen\u00ed \u201ed\u00edky\u201c sm\u011brnici \u201eDirective (EU) 2017\/853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Council Directive 91\/477\/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons\u201c, d\u00e1le v textu jen \u201esm\u011brnice\u201c), jejich\u017e pr\u00e1va zast\u00e1v\u00e1me, h\u00e1j\u00edme a chr\u00e1n\u00edme.<\/p>\n

K dal\u0161\u00edm bod\u016fm Va\u0161eho dopisu, uv\u00e1d\u00edme:<\/p>\n

1.Pln\u011b souhlas\u00edme s Va\u0161imi slovy cituji: \u201e.. I am confident that the flexibilities built in the final compromise (of the Directive) allow for the accomodation of national specificities in the national implementation of the new rules (of the Directive)..\u201c. Jak my, tak zejm\u00e9na mnoz\u00ed renomovan\u00ed osloven\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed z\u00e1stupci, ji\u017e d\u00e1vno a detailn\u011b zaznamenali tyto po\u010detn\u00e9 tzv. flexibility zakomponovan\u00e9 ve fin\u00e1ln\u00ed verzi sm\u011brnice a byli jsme si jisti stran c\u00edlen\u00e9ho, efektivn\u00edho a strategick\u00e9ho z\u00e1m\u011bru t\u011bchto flexibilit. D\u011bkujeme V\u00e1m, \u017ee n\u00e1m prost\u0159ednictv\u00edm Va\u0161ich slov potvrzujete tuto skute\u010dnost, tedy skute\u010dnost, \u017ee \u201efin\u00e1ln\u00ed kompromisn\u00ed verze sm\u011brnice, d\u00edky tzv. flexibilit\u00e1m uveden\u00fdm ve fin\u00e1ln\u00edm zn\u011bn\u00ed, dovoluje \u010dlensk\u00fdm zem\u00edm p\u0159izp\u016fsoben\u00ed se n\u00e1rodn\u00edm specifik\u016fm p\u0159i n\u00e1rodn\u00ed implementaci pravidel sm\u011brnice\u201c. Jsme jisti, \u017ee EU zem\u011b v\u00edtaj\u00ed tak moudr\u00fd p\u0159\u00edstup, tedy cituji op\u011btovn\u011b \u201eto allow for the accomodation of national specificities in the national implementation of the new rules (of the Directive)\u201c a jsme si tak\u00e9 jisti, \u017ee toto op\u011bt p\u0159ibl\u00ed\u017e\u00ed EU zem\u011b k sam\u00e9 EU, m\u00edn\u011bno bl\u00ed\u017ee k p\u016fvodn\u00ed a beze sporu dobr\u00e9 idee EU, kdy tato idea byla bohu\u017eel po\u0161kozena jist\u00fdmi kroky EU komise (nehovo\u0159\u00edme zde pouze o dot\u010den\u00e9 sm\u011brnici \/Directive (EU) 2017\/853 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 May 2017 amending Council Directive 91\/477\/EEC on control of the acquisition and possession of weapons\/).<\/p>\n

2. Va\u0161e slova cituji: \u201e..As to your query regarding the European Commission\u00b4s Representation in the Czech Republic, I would like to inform you that all internal rules and security procedures have been fully respected…\u201c n\u00e1s \u0161okovala, \u0159e\u010deno velice up\u0159\u00edmn\u011b, v\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane Junckere, v\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane Pesonene. Znamen\u00e1 to, \u017ee nesmysln\u00e9 a absurdn\u00ed, obrovsk\u00e9 policejn\u00ed kordony proti slu\u0161n\u00fdm a poklidn\u00fdm n\u011bkolika ob\u010dan\u016fm, kte\u0159\u00ed jen cht\u011bj\u00ed p\u0159edat 1 list pap\u00edru (!!), tj. protestn\u00ed n\u00f3ty, jsou standartn\u00edm a pln\u011b respektovan\u00fdm procesem EU komise ? Domn\u00edv\u00e1me se, \u017ee jste mo\u017en\u00e1 jen pln\u011b neporozum\u011bli d\u011bn\u00ed v Praze ve dni 14\/9 p\u0159ed budovou zastoupen\u00ed EU komise, a jsme proto pln\u011b p\u0159ipraveni toto v\u0161e znovu osv\u011btlit, zopakovat, prok\u00e1zat.<\/p>\n

3. D\u00e1le pak, nem\u016f\u017eeme v \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b bohu\u017eel souhlasit s Va\u0161im cituji: \u201e.. Directive has been duly approved by the Council of the EU and by the European Parliament\u2026\u201c. Jak velice dob\u0159e v\u00edte, na\u0161e zem\u011b, \u010cesk\u00e1 republika, podala \u0159\u00e1dnou \u017ealobu na platnost dot\u010den\u00e9 sm\u011brnice k Evropsk\u00e9mu soudn\u00edmu dvoru a jeden z velice d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdch argument\u016f t\u00e9to \u017ealoby je n\u00e1sleduj\u00edc\u00ed:<\/p>\n

Vzniklo mnoho \u201eproblematick\u00fdch a\u017e podivn\u00fdch aspekt\u016f\u201c p\u0159i samotn\u00e9m procesu p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed t\u00e9to, na\u0161\u00ed zem\u00ed ji\u017e u soudn\u00edho dvora napaden\u00e9, sm\u011brnice. N\u00e1vrh sm\u011brnice, rozhodn\u011b nebyl dostate\u010dn\u011b d\u016fkladn\u011b p\u0159ipraven a ani projedn\u00e1n, a tedy touto sm\u011brnic\u00ed zav\u00e1d\u011bn\u00e9 v\u00e1\u017en\u00e9 zm\u011bny byly zna\u010dn\u011b, skute\u010dn\u011b zna\u010dn\u011b kontroverzn\u00ed ji\u017e v pr\u016fb\u011bhu jej\u00edho samotn\u00e9ho p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed. V t\u00e9to souvislosti poukazujeme zejm\u00e9na v prv\u00e9 \u0159ad\u011b na skute\u010dnost, \u017ee n\u00e1vrh sm\u011brnice byl p\u0159ijat pr\u016fkazn\u011b v reakci na pa\u0159\u00ed\u017esk\u00e9 teroristick\u00e9 \u00fatoky ze dne 13. listopadu roku 2015 \u2013 a to pouh\u00e9 t\u0159i pracovn\u00ed dny (!!) po t\u011bchto hrozn\u00fdch a odsouzen\u00edhodn\u00fdch \u00fatoc\u00edch. Evropsk\u00e1 komise tak zjevn\u011b, ve snaze uk\u00e1zat \u0161irok\u00e9 ve\u0159ejnosti \u201e\u017ee rychle \u010din\u00ed a \u0159e\u0161\u00ed a kon\u00e1\u201c, tzv. sklouzla k naprosto absurdn\u00edmu, nesmysln\u00e9mu a nepochopiteln\u00e9mu kon\u00e1n\u00ed \u2013 tedy ke sm\u011brnici \u201eodzbrojuj\u00edc\u00ed zcela nevinn\u00e9 a odzbrojuj\u00edc\u00ed ob\u011bti a z\u00e1sadn\u011b posiluj\u00edc\u00ed provinil\u00e9, tj. pachatele\u201c.<\/p>\n

K n\u00e1vrhu t\u00e9to sm\u011brnice, nav\u00edc nebylo d\u00e1le pr\u016fkazn\u011b zpracov\u00e1no posouzen\u00ed dopad\u016f, p\u0159esto\u017ee n\u00e1vrh sm\u011brnice p\u0159edj\u00edmal skute\u010dn\u011b radik\u00e1ln\u00ed zm\u011bnu dosavadn\u00edho re\u017eimu nab\u00fdv\u00e1n\u00ed a dr\u017een\u00ed zbran\u00ed v EU, s potenci\u00e1lem zas\u00e1hnout do vlastnick\u00fdch pr\u00e1v milion\u016f ob\u010dan\u016f EU a dokonce ovlivnit bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed situaci v \u010dlensk\u00fdch st\u00e1tech. D\u00e1le zd\u016fraz\u0148ujeme i neoddiskutovatelnou kontroverznost t\u00e9to pr\u00e1vn\u00ed \u00fapravy a poukazujeme na fakt, \u017ee p\u016fvodn\u00ed podoba n\u00e1vrhu sm\u011brnice Komise byla podrobena velice, velice v\u00fdrazn\u00e9 kritice jak na p\u016fd\u011b Evropsk\u00e9ho parlamentu, tak v r\u00e1mci sv\u00e9ho projedn\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed v r\u00e1mci pracovn\u00edch skupin Rady. By\u0165 se n\u011bkter\u00e9 problematick\u00e9 body n\u00e1vrhu poda\u0159ilo postupn\u011b v pr\u016fb\u011bhu legislativn\u00edho procesu odstranit (\u010di u\u010dinit kompromisn\u00ed, flexibiln\u00ed, ad v\u00fd\u0161e), nebylo tomu bohu\u017eel tak zdaleka u v\u0161ech problematick\u00fdch ustanoven\u00ed. A d\u00e1le:<\/p>\n

P\u0159ijet\u00edm p\u0159edm\u011btn\u00e9 sm\u011brnice, z\u00e1sadn\u011b p\u0159ekro\u010dil \u201eunijn\u00ed z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce\u201c sv\u00e9 pravomoci – a\u010dkoliv byla toti\u017e sm\u011brnice p\u0159ijata za \u00fa\u010delem odstran\u011bn\u00ed p\u0159ek\u00e1\u017eek vnit\u0159n\u00edho trhu, jej\u00edm skute\u010dn\u00fdm c\u00edlem je v\u00fdhradn\u011b a pouze boj proti terorismu a jin\u00e9 z\u00e1va\u017en\u00e9 trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti. Unijn\u00ed z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce ov\u0161em k p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed harmoniza\u010dn\u00edch opat\u0159en\u00ed v t\u00e9to oblasti nem\u00e1 \u017e\u00e1dnou pravomoc.<\/p>\n

Unijn\u00ed z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce, p\u0159ijet\u00edm sm\u011brnice, d\u00e1le poru\u0161il tak\u00e9 i z\u00e1sadu proporcionality, jeliko\u017e se nezab\u00fdval v\u016fbec ot\u00e1zkou tzv. p\u0159im\u011b\u0159enosti zav\u00e1d\u011bn\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed a neprovedl posouzen\u00ed n\u00e1sledn\u00fdch dopad\u016f. O tyto dopady, bylo nes\u010detn\u011bkr\u00e1t \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1no a nad\u00e1le je \u017e\u00e1d\u00e1no, jak ji\u017e v\u00fd\u0161e \u0159e\u010deno, ov\u0161em EU komise tyto \u017e\u00e1dosti nereflektuje. To n\u00e1sledn\u011b vedlo k tomu, \u017ee p\u0159ijal opat\u0159en\u00ed zjevn\u011b a pr\u016fkazn\u011b nezp\u016fsobil\u00e1 a nep\u0159im\u011b\u0159en\u00e1 vzhledem ke sledovan\u00e9mu c\u00edli \u2013 sm\u011brnice tak nap\u0159\u00edklad plo\u0161n\u011b zakazuje typy zbran\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se k p\u00e1ch\u00e1n\u00ed terorismu \u010di k jin\u00e9 trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti v Evrop\u011b v\u016fbec neu\u017e\u00edvaj\u00ed. Pro po\u0159\u00e1dek a komplexnost uv\u00e1d\u00edme, \u017ee \u010cR dopady pro sv\u00e9 \u00fa\u010dely zpracovala.<\/p>\n

Sm\u011brnice je d\u00e1le pak v rozporu se z\u00e1sadou tzv. pr\u00e1vn\u00ed jistoty. Cel\u00e1 \u0159ada ustanoven\u00ed sm\u011brnice toti\u017e pr\u016fkazn\u011b nen\u00ed dostate\u010dn\u011b jasn\u00e1 a p\u0159esn\u00e1, nen\u00ed exaktn\u00ed, aby umo\u017enila dot\u010den\u00fdm osob\u00e1m jednozna\u010dn\u011b a nezpochybniteln\u011b rozpoznat, konat a ct\u00edt jejich pr\u00e1va a povinnosti. V\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e1 ustanoven\u00ed sm\u011brnice, jsou tedy nejasn\u00e1 a otev\u0159en\u00e1 bohu\u017eel i cel\u00e9 \u0159ad\u011b r\u016fzn\u00fdch interpretac\u00ed a v\u00fdklad\u016f a pochopen\u00ed, p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e v\u0161echny tyto mo\u017en\u00e9 interpretace, se mnohdy jev\u00ed jako velice obt\u00ed\u017en\u011b a n\u00e1ro\u010dn\u011b aplikovateln\u00e9 v praxi. Tato ustanoven\u00ed tak v \u017e\u00e1dn\u00e9m p\u0159\u00edpad\u011b nemohou b\u00fdti zp\u016fsobil\u00e1 k harmonizaci podm\u00ednek nab\u00fdv\u00e1n\u00ed a dr\u017een\u00ed zbran\u00ed na vnit\u0159n\u00edm trhu EU. Jist\u00e1 ustanoven\u00ed sm\u011brnice, jsou skute\u010dn\u011b tak rozporupln\u00e1, tak absurdn\u00ed, atd., \u017ee vylo\u017een\u011b zakl\u00e1daj\u00ed pro budouc\u00ed pr\u00e1vn\u00ed nevymahatelnost. Netyk\u00e1 se v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00fdch \u010d\u00e1st\u00ed sm\u011brnice \u201ekompromisn\u00edch \u010di flexibiln\u00edch\u201c, je\u017e byla naopak moud\u0159e a strategicky c\u00edlen\u011b zpracov\u00e1na.
\nSm\u011brnice m\u00e1 nav\u00edc, a tak\u00e9 bez nejmen\u0161\u00ed polemiky, dokonce diskrimina\u010dn\u00ed povahu \u2013 umo\u017e\u0148uje toti\u017e v\u00fdjimku ze z\u00e1kazu dr\u017een\u00ed zbran\u00ed, kter\u00e1 ale m\u016f\u017ee dopadnout v\u00fdhradn\u011b na \u0161v\u00fdcarsk\u00fd syst\u00e9m ponech\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed vojensk\u00fdch zbran\u00ed p\u0159i ukon\u010den\u00ed vojensk\u00e9 slu\u017eby, ani\u017e by stejn\u00e9 takov\u00e9 v\u00fdjimky mohly vyu\u017e\u00edt ostatn\u00ed st\u00e1ty EU. Zp\u016fsob, jak\u00fdm je dan\u00e1 v\u00fdjimka konstruov\u00e1na a sestavena, tedy jednozna\u010dn\u011b vylu\u010duje jej\u00ed u\u017eit\u00ed v jin\u00fdch \u010dlensk\u00fdch st\u00e1tech EU, by\u0165 i tyto st\u00e1ty mohou m\u00edt a maj\u00ed legitimn\u00ed a re\u00e1ln\u00fd z\u00e1jem na takov\u00e9m re\u017eimu ve vztahu ke sv\u00fdm syst\u00e9m\u016fm vojensk\u00e9 slu\u017eby, ov\u0161em z historick\u00fdch d\u016fvod\u016f nemohou spl\u0148ovat podm\u00ednku trv\u00e1n\u00ed 50ti let. Dan\u00e9 ustanoven\u00ed sm\u011brnice, tedy zav\u00e1d\u00ed naprosto odli\u0161n\u00e9 zach\u00e1zen\u00ed se st\u00e1ty (a t\u00edm ve fin\u00e1ln\u00edm d\u016fsledku i s leg\u00e1ln\u00edmi vlastn\u00edky zbran\u00ed v dan\u00fdch st\u00e1tech), p\u0159i\u010dem\u017e toto odli\u0161n\u00e9 zach\u00e1zen\u00ed nelze objektivn\u011b zd\u016fvodnit ve sv\u011btle p\u0159edm\u011btu a c\u00edl\u016f napaden\u00e9 sm\u011brnice. Tyto st\u00e1ty, respektive leg\u00e1ln\u00ed dr\u017eitel\u00e9 zbran\u00ed v t\u011bchto st\u00e1tech, jsou p\u0159itom z hlediska \u00fa\u010delu t\u00e9to v\u00fdjimky ve zcela toto\u017en\u00e9 situaci. S ohledem na v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9, jsme pevn\u011b p\u0159esv\u011bd\u010deni, \u017ee podm\u00ednky pro aplikaci v\u00fd\u0161e uveden\u00e9 v\u00fdjimky jsou v rozporu se z\u00e1sadou z\u00e1kazu diskriminace. Dal\u0161\u00ed uk\u00e1zkou jasn\u00e9ho a z\u0159ejm\u00e9ho diskrimina\u010dn\u00edho prvku v t\u00e9to sm\u011brnici, je tak\u00e9 tzv. grandfathering, tedy p\u0159echodn\u00e9 ustanoven\u00ed pro st\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed dr\u017eitele zakazovan\u00fdch zbran\u00ed, kter\u00fd rozd\u011bl\u00ed ob\u010dany do dvou kategori\u00ed \u2013 nad\u0159azen\u00e1 a pod\u0159azen\u00e1, doslova lep\u0161\u00ed a hor\u0161\u00ed, zv\u00fdhodn\u011bn\u00e1 a znev\u00fdhodn\u011bn\u00e1. A za dal\u0161\u00ed uk\u00e1zku diskrimina\u010dn\u00edho charakteru pova\u017eujeme ve sm\u011brnici uvedenou skute\u010dnost, \u017ee p\u0159i situac\u00edch typu d\u011bd\u011bn\u00ed, \u010di ztr\u00e1ty zbrojn\u00edho pr\u016fkazu, jedinec p\u0159ich\u00e1z\u00ed o majetek (zbra\u0148), tedy majetek z\u00e1konn\u011b nabyt\u00fd, jde o jak\u00e9si vyvlastn\u011bn\u00ed, je\u017e je v rozporu s \u00dastavou.<\/p>\n

Evropsk\u00e1 komise nem\u00e1, le\u010d p\u0159esto vstupuje do tzv. trialogu. Kdy trialog nen\u00ed nijak zakotven v evropsk\u00fdch smlouv\u00e1ch, ba nep\u0159inesla ho dokonce ani Lisabonsk\u00e1 smlouva. Toto je tedy rozhodn\u011b pova\u017eov\u00e1no, vn\u00edm\u00e1no za nedemokratick\u00e9 a netransparentn\u00ed jedn\u00e1n\u00ed.<\/p>\n

P\u0159i p\u0159ij\u00edmac\u00edm procesu sm\u011brnice, nebyly br\u00e1ny v potaz p\u0159ipom\u00ednky europoslanc\u016f. Kdy bylo pod\u00e1no na 60 pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00edch n\u00e1vrh\u016f. Na pozm\u011b\u0148ovac\u00ed n\u00e1vrhy dvac\u00edtky \u010desk\u00fdch europoslanc\u016f, kte\u0159\u00ed proti sm\u011brnici protestovali, v\u016fbec nedo\u0161lo.<\/p>\n

Velmi d\u016fle\u017eit\u00fdm faktem tak\u00e9 je Lisabonsk\u00e1 smlouva, konkr\u00e9tn\u011b v\u00fdtah \u010dl\u00e1nku 346 b) ka\u017ed\u00fd \u010dlensk\u00fd st\u00e1t m\u016f\u017ee u\u010dinit opat\u0159en\u00ed, kter\u00e1 pova\u017euje za nezbytn\u00e1 k ochran\u011b podstatn\u00fdch z\u00e1jm\u016f sv\u00e9 bezpe\u010dnosti a kter\u00e1 jsou spjata s v\u00fdrobou zbran\u00ed, st\u0159eliva a v\u00e1le\u010dn\u00e9ho materi\u00e1lu nebo obchodem s nimi; tato opat\u0159en\u00ed nesm\u00ed nep\u0159\u00edzniv\u011b ovlivnit podm\u00ednky hospod\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e9 sout\u011b\u017ee na vnit\u0159n\u00edm trhu s v\u00fdrobky, kter\u00e9 nejsou ur\u010deny v\u00fdlu\u010dn\u011b k vojensk\u00fdm \u00fa\u010del\u016fm. Tedy, bezpe\u010dnost je v dikci ka\u017ed\u00e9 \u010dlensk\u00e9 zem\u011b ! A d\u00e1le uv\u00e1d\u00edme souvisej\u00edc\u00ed a ji\u017e d\u0159\u00edve zm\u00edn\u011bn\u00e9 – a\u010dkoliv byla sm\u011brnice p\u0159ijata na z\u00e1klad\u011b \u010dl. 114 SFEU (Smlouvy o fungov\u00e1n\u00ed Evropsk\u00e9 unie) jej\u00edm skute\u010dn\u00fdm c\u00edlem je harmonizace p\u0159edpis\u016f \u010dlensk\u00fdch st\u00e1t\u016f v oblasti p\u0159edch\u00e1zen\u00ed trestn\u00e9 \u010dinnosti a terorismu. K p\u0159ijet\u00ed takov\u00fdch opat\u0159en\u00ed ov\u0161em unijn\u00ed z\u00e1konod\u00e1rce nem\u00e1 pravomoc, pon\u011bvad\u017e harmonizaci v t\u00e9to oblasti v\u00fdslovn\u011b vylu\u010duje \u010dl. 84 SFEU. Tento p\u0159\u00edstup odpov\u00edd\u00e1 tomu, \u017ee podle \u010dl. 4 odst. 2 SEU maj\u00ed \u010dlensk\u00e9 st\u00e1ty v\u00fdhradn\u00ed odpov\u011bdnost za zaji\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed n\u00e1rodn\u00ed bezpe\u010dnosti na sv\u00e9m \u00fazem\u00ed, a tud\u00ed\u017e mus\u00ed m\u00edt mo\u017enost zajistit na sv\u00e9m \u00fazem\u00ed dodr\u017eov\u00e1n\u00ed ve\u0159ejn\u00e9ho po\u0159\u00e1dku.<\/p>\n

V\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane Junckere, V\u00e1\u017een\u00fd pane Pesonene,<\/p>\n

d\u011bkujeme velmi za \u010das dedikovan\u00fd na\u0161emu dopisu zde, v\u011bnovan\u00fd na\u0161im argument\u016fm a t\u011b\u0161\u00edme se na Va\u0161i dal\u0161\u00ed, brzkou odezvu. Shora n\u00e1mi uveden\u00e1 fakta, rozhodn\u011b nejsou ve\u0161ker\u00e1 a vy\u010derp\u00e1vaj\u00edc\u00ed, ale kl\u00ed\u010dov\u00e1 ano.<\/p>\n

V \u00fact\u011b k V\u00e1m,<\/p>\n

za peti\u010dn\u00ed v\u00fdbory obou petic proti odzbrojen\u00ed,
\nza pr\u00e9zidium lidskopr\u00e1vn\u00ed bezpe\u010dnostn\u00ed LIGY LIBE,<\/p>\n

Bc. Carla Cizova, MBA, v.r.
\nLIGA LIBE, z.s.<\/p>\n

<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

V\u00e1\u017een\u00ed a zde ji\u017e odpov\u011b\u010f LIGY LIBE panu Junckerovi na jeho ned\u00e1vn\u00fd dopis (viz koment zde n\u00ed\u017ee), co n\u00e1m minule… <\/p>\n

Read More Komunikace LIGY s J.C.Junckerem pokra\u010duje !<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":140239199,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_wpcom_ai_launchpad_first_post":false,"_jetpack_hide_featured_image":false,"_jetpack_featured_image_duplicate_dismissed":0,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"{title}\n\n{excerpt}\n\n{url}","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[438743],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aktuality"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9ZdzN-jG","amp_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/140239199"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1220"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1221,"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1220\/revisions\/1221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ligalibe.cz\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}